返回列表 發帖
本帖最後由 erwincdw 於 2017-10-19 17:24 編輯

必然的結論


THE CONCLUSIONS ARE INESCAPABLE:


(1)秘密權力階層也許認為出於人們的無知,或出於神意旨,地球在不久將來將會毁滅。這些人真心相信他們的所作所為是對的,是為了拯救人類。但極為諷刺的是他們合作的夥伴自身就是個面臨滅絕的外星種族,在這個合作中許多道德和法律議題都被妥協了,這些妥協是錯的,應該要修正。他們的行為應負起責任,我能了解他們決定不讓大眾知情時心中面對的恐懼和急迫感,但我並不同意這決定。

整個歷史中不斷有一小撮權力精英,認為只憑他們少數幾人就能決定多數人的命運,但歷史洪流顯示他們錯了。我們這偉大的國家是建立在自由和民主的原則之上,我真心認為如果美國這國家違背了這原則,再怎麼努力也不可能成功。對大眾的全面揭露是必要的,我們應該共同努力來挽救人類。


(2)我們被人類/外星聯盟操縱,目標是達成對人類某種程度奴役的單一世界政府。有必要面對一個最基本的問題:「誰能代表地球?」他們認為人類的進化程度還不足以面對外星種族,我們自己在不同民族間的問題已夠多了,再加上一個外星種族情況會變成什麼樣?它們會不會被羞辱、虐待、殺害?即使隔離但一旦相遇發生衝突,外星人優越的科技是否會造成人類的厄運?世界領袖是否已決定要把人類關進圍欄了?要避免這些情況的惟方式,是讓人類的意識有個進化的躍進,思惟模式必需改變。我不知道要如何做到這點,但我知道非做不可,而且要儘快、但不著痕跡的做。


(3)外星勢力完全欺騙了我們政府,也操控了我們,這導致了人類的全面奴役和毁壞。我們必需拿出任何可行的方法來制止。


(4)如果以上都是錯的,就表示發生的是其它超出找們目前可理解範圍的事。我們更必需強迫揭露所有的事實,以從中發掘出真相。這現況是由於過去44年來我們的所作所為,或無所作為,這是我們自己的錯,只有我們能改變未來。在我看來教育是解決辦法中最主要的一部份,其餘的就是不能再對大眾隱瞞。


(5)不能排除一種可能,就是我被利用了,整個外星議題是人類史上最大騙局,是虛構出外星威脅以促成單一世界政府的議程。我有找到支持這觀點的證據,我把它放在附錄中,我建議你們不要排除這個可能性。

出於無知和誤導,我們人民已放棄了監督政府的責任,我們的政府是「民有、民治、民享」,沒有理由要放棄監督的責任,而盲目的信任只那幾個時常進行秘密會議的少數人,任由他們決定我們的命運。事實上我們的政府組織是設計來預防這情形的,如果我們有儘到公民的責任,事情就不會演變到今日這情形。大部份的人對政府基本功能都完全無知,我們真的已成為羊群之國,而羊群的結局就是被屠宰。是時候像我們先輩一樣像個男人般挺直腰桿了。讓我提醒你們,歐洲猶太人雖已收到警告,但仍不相信事實可能是真的,仍乖乖走進牢籠中。當外面世界收到訊息,說歐洲的希特勒在進行大屠殺時,仍不相信。

你們要了解,不論外星人是真是假,這議題真被用來做為消滅不同地區人口的藉口。「別擔心,神聖的宇宙兄弟會來拯救我們。」這想法也可用來配合外星威脅論:「外星人會吃人」,促成新世界秩序的進程。決定你們未來行動的最重要資訊是,新世界秩序會摧毁每個國家的主權,包括美國。新世界秩序不可能允許我們憲法的存在,它會是個全然的極權式社會主義國家,我們將被無現金經濟系統所奴役。

如果我在海軍情報單位看過的資料是真實的,那麼你們剛才讀到的就應該是最接近真相的了。如果外星人是個騙局,那你們讀到的則是光明會要讓你們相信的事。我可以向你們保證,撇開所有迷團,那些科技絕對是真的。由人類駕駛的反重力飛船的確存在,我和數以百萬計的人都看過它們,它們是金屬製、是機器、有各種形狀和大小,很明顯是智慧生物所操縱。


雷根總統至戈巴契夫:

如果突然出現來自別的星球,別的種族對我們世界的威脅,我們將會抛開彼此國家間的所有微不足道的歧異,明白其實我們都是地球上的人類。

SOURCES
Andrews, George C, Extra-Terrestrials Among Us, Llewellyn Publications, St.
Paul, Minnesota.
Bamford, James, The Puzzle Palace, Houghton Mifflin, Boston.
Borklund, C. W., The Department of Defense, Frederick A. Praeger, New York.
Collier, Peter and David Horowitz, Rockefellers: An American Dynasty, Holt.
Rinehart and Winston, New York.
Cooper, Vicki and Sherie Stark, eds., UFO (magazine — several issues since
Spring 1988), Los Angeles, California.
Cooper, William, "Operation Majority, Final Release/ Fullerton, California.
Corson, William R., The Armies of Ignorance, The Dial Press/James Wade, New
York.
Curry, Richard O., ed., Freedom at Risk, Temple University Press, Philadelphia.
Deyo, Stan, The Cosmic Conspiracy and The Vindictor Scrolls, West Australian
Texas Trading, Perth, Australia.
English, Bill, "Report on Grudge/Blue Book #13," John A. Lear, Las Vegas
Nevada.
Friend, Lt. Col. and Dr. J. Allen Hynek, "GRUDGE/Blue Book Report #13"
(Top Secret). Last seen at the headquarters of the Commander in Chief
of the Pacific Fleet (CINCPACFLT), Hawaii.
Graubard, Stephen, Kissinger, Portrait of a Mind, W.W. Norton & Co., New
York.
Gulley, Bill with Mary Ellen Reese, Breaking Cover, Simon & Schuster, New
York.
Hawking, Stephen W., A Brief History of Time: From the Big Bang to Black Holes,
Bantam Books, New York.
Isaacson, Walter and Evan Thomas, The Wise Men, Simon & Schuster, New
York.
Kissinger, Henry, Nuclear Weapons and Foreign Policy, Harper & Brothers, New
York.
Kwitny, Jonathan, The Crimes of Patriots, W.W. Norton & Co., New York.
Chapter Twelve The Secret Government • 237
Lear, John A., "The John Lear Hypothesis," Las Vegas, Nevada. Partially true;
the rest is disinformation.
Lear, John A. and John Grace, "The Krill Papers Hoax."
Ledeen, Michael A., Perilous Statecraft, Charles Scribner & Sons, New York.
"MAJIC/Operation Majority" (Top Secret). Presidential briefing document
by Majesty Twelve. Last seen at the headquarters of the Commander in
Chief of the Pacific Fleet (CINCPACFLT), Hawaii.
Mickus, Tom, 'The Larry Fenwick Interview," Canada.
Moscow, Alvin, The Rockefeller Inheritance, Doubleday & Co., New York.
"Operation MAJESTIC TWELVE," Eisenhower Briefing Document. Author
unknown, released by the research team of Moore, Shandera, and Friedman.
Pea Research, Government Involvement in the UFO Cover-up: Chronology, Pea
Research, California.
Ranelagh, John, The Agency: The Rise and Decline of the CIA, Simon & Schuster,
New York.
Schulzinger, Robert D., The Wise Men of Foreign Affairs, Columbia University
Press, New York.
Shoup, Laurence H. and William Minter, Imperial Brain Trust: The Council on
Foreign Relations & United States Foreign Policy, Monthly Review Press,New York.
Steckling, Fred, We Discovered Alien Bases on the Moon, G.A.F. International,
California.
Steiger, Brad, The UFO Abductors, Berkley Books, New York,
Stienman, William, The Crash at Aztec, William Stienman, La Mirada, California,
Strieber, Whitley, Communion and Majestic, Avon, New York.
Valerian, Valdamar, The Matrix, Arcturus Book Service, Stone Mountain,
Georgia.

======================================
第十二章完,後續十三、十四章麻煩 awepp兄負責,謝謝。

TOP

本帖最後由 dkcapital 於 2017-10-23 16:03 編輯

13章探討的是聯合國,相信各位看完對聯合國會有全然不一樣的認識。本章有較多的法條內容,如有翻譯錯誤敬請告知。
非常討厭法條很喜歡將一件事描述的很複雜,加一堆專有名詞,好讓民眾看不懂?
仔細看美國憲法第六條。
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Chapter 13

TREASON IN HIGH PLACES

高位置的背叛

The United Nations Treaty and The United Nations Participation Act

vs. The Sovereignty of the United States of America

聯合國條約  聯合國參與法  對上美國主權

At the conclusion of the Constitutional Convention

in September 1787, Benjamin Franklin was asked,

"What have you wrought?"

He answered,

"...a Republic, if you can keep it."

在制憲會議議定後,在1787年9月,班傑明.富蘭克林被問道,

"你已做了什麼?"

他回答,

"....一個共和國,如果你可以維持它的話。"

The United States Constitution

Article VI

All Debts contracted and Engagements entered into, before the Adoption

of this Constitution, shall be as valid against the United States under

this Constitution, as under the Confederation.

This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be

made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made,

under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the

Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in

the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.

The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members

of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers,

both of the United States and of the several States,shall be bound by Oath

or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever

be required as a Qualification to any Office or publicTrust under the

United States.

美國憲法第六條(以下翻譯,部分來自維基)

所有在此憲法正式通過前的債務合約及約定,在此憲法下,同邦聯時期,對合眾國是有效的。

本憲法和依本憲法所制定的合眾國法律,以及根據合眾國的權力已締結或將締結的一切條約,都是全國的最高法律;每個州的法官都應受其約束,即使州的憲法和法律中有與之相牴觸的內容。

上述參議員和眾議員,各州州議會議員,以及合眾國和各州所有行政和司法官員,應宣誓或作代誓宣言擁護本憲法;但決不得以宗教信仰作為擔任合眾國屬下任何官職或公職的必要資格

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

第1、3段各位應該都沒疑問,看得懂。重點在第2段,我看了老半天才知道意思....

意思是所有美國及將或已簽訂的條約,等同美國憲法的至高地位。

有個解釋美國憲法非常棒的中文網站:https://web-archive-2017.ait.org.tw/infousa/zhtw/PUBS/Constitution/constitution.htm

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

HAVE WE ALREADY JOINED A ONE-WORLD

GOVERNMENT?

U.S. Sovereignty — Fact or Fiction?

我們已經加入世界政府了嗎?

美國主權-事實或小說?

The Executive, Judicial and Legislative Branches of the U.S. Government

have followed the policy that the United Nations Treaty approved

under the U.N. Participation Act of 1945 in behalf of the United States of

America by Harry S. Truman and the United States Senate,which treaty

supersedes the United States Constitution under the terms of Article VI of

the United States Constitution.

美國政府的行政、司法、立法部門,已經跟隨聯合國條約通過的政策,在1945聯合國參與法下,由哈里S.杜魯門及參議院代表簽署,此條約根據憲法第六條取代美國憲法。

The Council of Foreign Relations created the United Nations. Their

member agents, Alger Hiss and Leo Pasvolsky did the paperwork, but the

honors went to a special committee appointed by President Roosevelt to

draw the first draft of the Charter.

外交關係委員會成立了聯合國。他們的成員代理人,阿爾傑.希斯(Alger Hiss)利奧.帕斯沃爾斯基(Leo Pasvolsky)做文書工作,但光輝終於來到,羅斯福總統指派一個特別的委員會去寫出聯合國憲章第一草案。

The members of the Committee were: Sumner Wells, Isaiah Bowman,

Hamilton Fish Armstrong, Benjamin Cohen, and Clark Eichelberger — all

members of the Council on Foreign Relations and members of a secret

Order of the Quest called the JASON Society.

委員會的成員有: Sumner WellsIsaiah BowmanHamilton Fish ArmstrongBenjamin CohenClark Eichelberger-所有外交關係委員會成員及一個秘密秩序追求團體(Order of the Quest)傑森會社(JASON Society)的成員。

The Charter was rushed through the U.S. Senate without printed

copies to guide the Senators: it was EXPLAINED to them by Russian-born

revolutionary Leo Pasvolsky.

憲章闖過參議院,且沒有任何影本給參議員審查:而是由俄國出生的革命家利奧.帕斯沃爾斯基(Leo Pasvolsky)向議員們解釋

The Charter conferred no real power on the General Assembly; all the

power was in the Security Council where the VETO was. The Senate

would not have ratified the Charter except that the American delegation

had a right to VETO if our interests were threatened by action of other

members.

憲章沒有賦予聯合國大會實權;所有權力都在安理會的否決權裡。參議院不需批准憲章,美國代表團擁有否決的權力,如果我們利益受到其他成員行為的威脅。

Included in this Charter was and is ARTICLE 25:"Member nations

agree to ACCEPT and CARRY OUT the decisions of the Security Council in

accordance with the PRESENT CHARTER"

在憲章的25條:"根據目前憲章,會員國同意去接受執行安理會的決定"

No restrictions, no reservations. This is ALL of Article 25. Note the

word "present," indicating that there might be OTHER charters. The

VETO was a hindrance to World Government — it had to be circumvented.

In 1950 the General Assembly, without any legal authority, met and

adopted what they named the "UNITING FOR PEACE"RESOLUTION.

沒有限制,沒有保留。這就是25條的全部。注意"目前"這個詞,暗示著可能將會是其他憲章。否決權是個世界政府的阻礙-它必須被規避。

1950年的聯合國大會,在沒有任何法律權力下做出他們名為" (UNITING FOR PEACE)聯合一致共策和平 "的決議。

This, greatly expanded since that time, permitted THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY

to EXERCISE THE POWERS OF THE SECURITY COUNCIL. I

bet you didn't know that. The Government of the United States recognizes

the illegally amended Charter as the "law of theworld," overriding our

Constitution. The General Assembly has for years been making the law of

the world by RATIFYING RESOLUTIONS BY A 2/3 MAJORITY VOTE.

When the Resolution is ratified it is sent down to the CHIEF EXECUTIVE

OF THE MEMBER STATE and the EXECUTIVE IS OBLIGED TOACCEPT

AND CARRY OUT the provisions in the resolution.

從這點之後大大地擴張,允許大會去行使安理會的力量。我打賭你不知道。美國政府意識到非法修改憲章(作為世界法)將壓垮我們的憲法。聯合國大會多年下來已經制定許多世界法,藉由2/3多數票來通過決議當決議批准並送到會員國的行政首長時,行政首長必須強制接受及執行決議中的規定。

The governments concerned must IGNORE, ABOLISH, REVISEAND

RESCIND LAWS in their territories which conflict with there solutions of

the General Assembly, and to PASS OTHER LAWS WHICH WILL PUT

THESE RESOLUTIONS INTO FORCE. "One man, one vote" comes

through Resolution No. 1760.

There are more than 2000 of these resolutions now in effect. THEY

ARE THE LAW OF THE LAND. Our civil rights laws (the ex-post facto

sections of which come from the Nuremberg Resolutions),our agricultural

laws, our health and welfare laws, our labor laws, our foreign aid laws —

all come from resolutions of the General Assembly or treaties of the U.N.

ratified by our Senate.

政府們的憂慮必須忽略、肅清、修改及廢除它們的國土法,那些與大會決議相衝突的國土,然後通過其他將會強制執行的法律。"一人一票"導至1760號決議通過。

現在有超過2000個決議生效。他們是國內法。我們的民權法(事實上部分來自紐倫堡決議)、我們的農業法、我們的健康及福利法、我們的勞工法、我們的對外援助法-全部來自聯合國大會決議,或由我們參議院批准的聯合國條約。

Any law passed in your state will be rescinded or abolished if it is in

conflict with resolutions of the General Assembly.

I can tell you, with no reservations whatsoever, that all of the intelligence

organizations of the United States work directly for the United

Nations in concert with the Secret Government toward the sole purpose of

the destruction of the sovereignty of the United States of America and the

bringing about of the one-world government. The authority cited for their

efforts is ARTICLE VI of the Constitution, the United Nations Treaty, and

the U.N. Participation Act of 1949 signed by Harry S.Truman with the

advice and consent of the U.S. Senate.

所有你的州通過的法律,與聯合國大會決議相衝突的話,將會撤銷或廢除。我可以毫無保留通通告訴你,所有美國的情報組織直接為聯合國工作,並與秘密政府合作為了唯一目的,摧毀美國主權及產生世界政府。他們所為的權力來自憲法第6條、聯合國條約、及1949年聯合國參與法,在參議院的建議和批准下,由杜魯門簽署。

This should help you understand how our laws are being made and

who is making them! ASK YOUR SENATORS, CONGRESSMEN AND

STATE LEGISLATORS IF THEY ARE AWARE OF THESE FACTS.

The following statement was made by Mr. Carl B. Rix of Milwaukee,

former president of the American Bar Association, before a Senate subcommittee

which was hearing testimony on the proposed Bricker Amendment.

It was entered into the House Record by Hon. Lawrence H.Smith, Wisconsin,

on May 11,1955.

這樣應該可以幫助你了解,我們的法律是如何制定及誰制定它們!詢問你的參議員、眾議員及州立法者,是否他們察覺到這些事實。接下來的是來自Milwaukee密爾沃基Carl B. Rix先生的陳述,前美國律師協會會長,在參議院的一個小組委員會(Bricker修正案的聽證會),這由Hon. Lawrence H. Smith列入會議紀錄,威斯康辛州,1955年5月11號。

註: Bricker修正案是個統稱,這些修正案都有關一個項目,使美國法律、政策免受國外條約、行政協議、國際法、聯合國的影響。

TOP

本帖最後由 awepp 於 2017-10-23 09:20 編輯

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD (page A3220)

Statement of Carl B. Rix, Milwaukee, Wisconsin:

I appear in favor of the amendments.

Congress is no longer bound by its constitutional systemof delegated

powers. Its only test is under the obligatory power topromote human

rights in these fields of endeavor: Civil, political,economic, social and

cultural. These are found in Articles 55 and 56 of theCharter of the United

Nations, a ratified and approved treaty. They are beingpromoted in all

parts of the world by the United Nations.

會議記錄(A3220頁)

Carl B. Rix, Milwaukee, Wisconsin的聲明:

我贊成修正案。

國會不再受到其憲法託付權力的約束。其唯一的考驗是在強制力下,努力推動以下領域的人權:公民、政治、經濟、社會及文化。這些在聯合國,一個批准及認可的條約,第55及56條發現。這些正由聯合國在全世界各地推動。(這裡指的條約是聯合國憲章)

註:

聯合國憲章55條:

為造成國際間以尊重人民平等權利及自決原則為根據之和平友好關係所必要之安定及福利條件起見,聯合國應促進:
(1)較高之生活程度,全民就業,及經濟與社會進展。
(2)國際間經濟、社會、衛生、及有關問題之解決;國際間文化及教育合作。
(3)全體人類之人權及基本自由之普遍尊重與遵守,不分種族、性別、語言、或宗教。

56條:
各會員國擔允採取共同及個別行動與本組織合作,以達成第五十五條所載之宗旨。

Congress may now legislate as an uninhibited body with noshackles

of delegated powers under the Constitution. Our entiresystem of a

government of delegated powers of Congress has beenchanged to a system

of undelegated powers without amendment by the people ofthe

United States.

國會現在可以是個無約束的立法機構,在沒有憲法委付權力的枷鎖下。我們整個系統下國會的委付權力,已經轉變成一個非托付權力,且未經美國人民的修正。

The authority for these statements is found in a volumeentitled Constitution

of the United States of America, Annotated, issued in1953, prepared

under the direction of the Judiciary Committee of theSenate of the United

States and under the chairmanship of Prof. Edward S.Corwin of Princeton,

aided by the legal staff of the Library of Congress. Thisis the conclusion on

page 427 of the Annotations: "In a word, the treatypower cannot purport

to amend the Constitution by adding to the list ofCongress' enumerated

powers, but having acted, the consequence will often bethat it has

provided Congress with an opportunity to enact measureswhich, independently

of a treaty, Congress could not pass, and the onlyquestion that

can be raised as to such measures will be whether theyare 'necessary and

proper' measures for the carrying of the treaty inquestion into operation."

It will be noted that one of the principal cases cited isthat of the

Migratory Bird case.

這些陳述的依據是在一卷名稱為"美國憲法,註釋"上發現的,1953年發佈,由參議院司法委員會籌備指導,普林斯頓大學教授Edward S. Corwin擔任主席國會圖書館法務人員輔助。這是此註釋427頁的結論:"總之,締約權不能藉由增加國會權力列舉,來修改憲法,但卻有效,結果通常會是,國會有機會去制定一些措施,而這原本是無法通過的,所以唯一的問題會是,這些措施哪些是"必須且恰當的"好將條約問題變成行動。"

值得注意的最重要例子是候鳥例子(Migratory Bird case.)

These conclusions are those also of a committee of theNew York State

Bar Association, of which former Attorney GeneralMitchell and Mr. John

W. Davis were prominent members.

Now, for some practical illustration of new-found powersunder treaties of what Congress may do:

紐約律師聯合會也同樣作出這些結論,前司法部長MitchellMr. John W. Davis是其優秀成員。現在,關於國會議員也許會做的一些實際例證是:

1. It may enact a comprehensive education bill, providingfor education

in any State which does not provide it. In fact, it maytake over all

public education now provided by States andmunicipalities.

1.制定一個詳盡的教育法案給所有沒有這的州。事實上,這可以接管所有州及自治區的公共教育。

2. It may enact a prohibition act without an amendment ofthe Constitution.

2.可以在不修憲的情況下,制定禁止令。

3. It may enact a uniform divorce act.

3.可以制訂統一的離婚法。

4. It may take over all social and welfare servicesrendered by or

through the States or their agencies.

4.可以接管所有社會及福利服務。

5. It may take over all commerce, all utility rates andservice, all labor.

The list may be multiplied extensively at your will.

5.可以接管所有商業、所有公共事業費率及服務、所有勞工。

列表也許會倍增你的意願。

The new test of constitutionality will apply to alllegislation by Congress

since 1945, which deals with any of the five fields ofendeavor. Any

judge deciding on the validity of legislation must havetwo books before

him — one, the Constitution of the United States, and theother, the Charter

of the United Nations. If he does not find authority forthe act in the

Constitution, he will find it in the Charter. That is theexact situation in

which Justice Holmes found himself and the other membersof the

Supreme Court when they decided the Migratory Bird case.The authority

was not found in the Constitution — it was found in thetreaty with Great

Britain.

新的測試合憲性將會在,1945年後的國會在五領域(公民、政治、經濟、社會及文化)的立法上。所有法官在判決法律的合法性必須要有兩本書,一個是美國憲法,另一個本是聯合國憲章。如果對某法律他在找不到任何憲法給予的權限,他會找憲章。當Holmes法官及其他最高法院成員在決定候鳥例子時,正是這樣的情況,他發現無法在憲法上找到授權--而在與大不列顛簽訂的條約上發現。

The question to be answered is this: Under which form ofgovernment

do the people of the United States prefer to live?Manifestly, we cannot

operate under both.

Senators, the people of the United States have given uptheir sons; they

have given up billions of their substance. They shouldnot be the only

Nation in the world to give up their form of government —the wonder of

the world — to discharge their obligations to the peopleof the world.

對於問題的回答是:美國人民會比較喜歡生活在哪種形式下的政府?顯然,我們無法在兩者情況下運作。參議員,合眾國已放棄他們的兒子;他們已經放棄數十億的財產。美國不應該是世界唯一放棄他們政府的國家-世界奇蹟-卸下他們對人民的義務在全世界。

THE BRICKER AMENDMENT, WHICH WOULD HAVE CHANGED THIS,

WAS NOT PASSED.

BRICKER修正案將會改變它,所以不會通過。

A LETTER TO THE EDITOR

給編者的信

BRI Borger, Texas News Herald

Sunday, November 11,1962 1962年11月11日,星期日

Dear Mr. Newby:

親愛的紐比先生:

Replying to your letter Oct. 12th, also CHALLENGE forNovember,

1961: quoting Patrick Henry on treaties. In the firstplace Patrick Henry

was and is NO AUTHORITY on either treaties or theConstitution, and he

opposed it, IF it is too late to do anything aboutreinstating our Constitution,

then why not just accept the traitorous U.N.Charter-Treaty without

more ado? Why didn't the American Revolutionists think ittoo late or too

difficult to defend their Liberty? And IF thehighly-intelligent framers of

the Constitution "were well aware of the deathtrapincorporated in ARTICLE

VI," why then did they so frame it? Did they notexpect PATRIOTS,

rather than Treasonists as our elected officials, toHONOR AND ENFORCE

the spirit, letter, and intent of the Constitution?

回覆你10月12日的信,也挑戰你1961年11月的文章:引用(Patrick Henry)派屈克.亨利在條約。最早他沒有對條約或憲法的權力,然後他反對它,是否這時作行動來恢復我們憲法已經太遲,為何不直接接受賣國的聯合國憲章-條約就不用這麼累了?為何美國革命家們不認為捍衛他們自由太遲或太難?然後是否那些高智商的憲法制訂者們"有非常注意到憲法第6章上的死亡陷阱"為何他們還制定了它?作為民選官員,難道他們不是我們期望的愛國者而是個叛國者,以榮耀及執行憲法的精神、文字、意圖?

I note you say that according to a law dictionary, theterms "legal" and

"lawful" are almost one and the same. Agreed!"Almost," but not quite. I

believe there is a fine point of difference. Taking usinto the U.N. may

SEEM to have been done legally (by the President andSenate), but the act

is still unlawful, because it is unconstitutional, andthe CONSTITUTION IS

THE SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND. All renowned and genuineConstitutional

experts (such as Thos. M. Cooley, Thos. Jas. Norton, andHarry

Atwood, to name several) have always held that anythingwhich contravenes,

diminishes, or perverts the Constitution is null and voidand of

no effect.

我注意到你說,根據法律詞典,術語" legal"和" lawful"幾乎意思一樣。同意!"幾乎"但不完全是。我相信這有個很好的點來說明不同之處。想想我們(美國)進入聯合國也許看似合法地(legally)(由總統及參議院),但行為仍然是非法的(unlawful),因為這違憲,憲法是國土上的最高法律。所有著名及真誠的憲法專家(如Thos. M. Cooley, Thos. Jas.Norton, and Harry Atwood等等)一直認為任何違反、削弱、曲解憲法的東西、行為是無效、無用的。

Neither the President or Senate has authority or power tochange,

diminish, or destroy the Constitution "byusurpation," treaty, or otherwise:

only a Constitutional Amendment can lawfully change it.

總統及參議院都沒有權力或權威,藉由篡奪、條約或其它方式,挑戰、裁減、摧毀憲法。只有憲法修正案可以合法地改變它。

The Constitution is a contract that WE THE PEOPLE of theUSA made

with one another, which sets up the machinery ofgovernment to carry out

this contract —mainly for the purpose of PROTECTINGINDIVIDUAL

RIGHTS as well as STATE RIGHTS, AGAINST THE POWERS OF

GOVERNMENT: and no public official has a right tooverride the

provisions of that contract. To quote Thos. Jas. Norton'sConstitution of the

United States, Its Application, etc., "A law ofCongress to be one of the

supreme laws must be 'made in pursuance thereof and notin conflict with

the Constitution. When not made in pursuance thereof itis of course

unconstitutional and of no effect." And the samewould similarly apply to

a wonderful decision rendered by the Supreme Court or anunlawful

Treaty.

憲法是個我們美國人民與美國之間的契約,以建立政府機制去執行這契約-主要目的是為了個人及州的權力,抵抗政府權力:沒有公職人員可以廢除這條約之條款。引用Thos. Jas.Norton的美國憲法,"國會立法的最高規則是,制定時必須奉行不與憲法相衝突。當制定內容、過程違憲,則無效。"同樣的規則也適用做判別,在最高法院或違法的條約上。

And from Norton's Undermining the Constitution, whichquotes

Alexander Hamilton in No. 33 of The Federalist: "Itwill not, I presume,

have escaped observation that it expressly confines thesupremacy to laws

made pursuant to the Constitution" (emphasis byHamilton). And from

page 21, "The General Government can claim no powerswhich are not

granted to it by the Constitution, and the powersactually granted must be

such as are expressly given, or given by necessaryimplication."

從諾頓Norton的破壞憲法,引用亞力山大.漢密頓(Alexander Hamilton)的33號聯邦主義:"我認為這將不會逃離監視,它明確嚴格管制立法須根據憲法 "(漢密頓強調)。然後第21頁,"總政府在無憲法授權下將無權力,其權力授予必須明確地給出,或由必要的意涵給出"

Anyone with the presumed intelligence to be President ofthe USA

must know that he cannot lawfully make any suchfar-reaching treaty with

the United Nations, or any other foreign power, as youenvision by your

language, without laying himself open to the charge ofTREASON under

ARTICLE III, Section 3 of the Constitution. Just ordinarycommon sense is

required to know that our alleged Treaty with the U.N.and acceptance of

the all-inclusive terms of its Charter by our Presidents(beginning with

FDR, who connived with Stalin at Yalta for the setting upof the U.N. in the

USA) and our Senate, is a violation of their sacred oathof office as per

ARTICLE III, Section 2 of the Constitution.

任何有點智力的人當上了美國總統,一定知道他無法和聯合國、其他國外力量,或你想像到的語言,合法地做出如此深遠的條約,使他自己不會遭遇背叛憲法第3條第3款(叛國罪)的嫌疑。簡單需要知道的常識是,我們所謂與聯合國的條約,以及對包羅萬象的憲章所作的承諾,由我們總統(由羅斯福開始,他與史達林共謀成立聯合國,在美國雅爾達)及參議院做出的決定,是違反他們就職時的神聖誓言,在憲法第3條第2款。

註:這就是雅爾達會議。

Such a Treaty makes a mockery of any genuine allegianceto OUR Flag

and Constitution. A genuine American, Abraham Lincoln,said, "Worse

than traitors-in-arms are the men who, pretending loyaltyto the Flag, feast

and fatten on the misfortunes of the nation." Thinkof any TRUTH more

applicable to the present time?

這樣子的條約蔑視任何對我們國旗憲法真正的忠誠。一位真正的美國人,亞伯拉罕.林肯說:"更糟的是,武裝叛國者是一群人,假裝對國旗忠誠,在國家發生不幸時盡情吃喝然後肥胖起來。"想看看任何更多可適用於現在的事實。

A number of our officials, including former Secretary ofState Dean

Acheson, the late John Foster Dulles, and members of ourpresent oneworld

Kennedy entourage go along with the statement that theUSA now

has NO "domestic" affairs: there has been amelding of our domestic and

foreign affairs! (Meld means to merge.)

我們一些官員,包含前國務卿迪安.艾奇遜(Dean Acheson),後來的約翰.福斯特.杜勒斯(John Foster Dulles),以及許多現今甘迺迪隨員都認同這陳述,美國現在已經沒有"國內"事務:已經融和我們國內及過外事務!(融合意思是合併)

TOP

本帖最後由 awepp 於 2017-10-24 20:42 編輯

Katanga Province in the Congo thought she had some private affairs

and rights, but the U.N. soon disillusioned her. Quote from S.L. Tribune for

September 14,1961: "U.N. Soldiers Take Over in Katanga. U.N. troops

seized Katanga's capital, Elisabethville, in a brisk battle Wednesday, and

the Congo's central government proclaimed the return of that secessionist

province." There is no doubt that the President of the USA and Senate have

surrendered certain of our rights and Sovereignty to the U.N., and plan still

more.

剛果的加丹加省想要獨立,但很快的聯合國使其幻想破滅。引自1961年9月14日的S.L. Tribune:"聯合國士兵接管了加丹加省。聯合國軍隊在星期三的輕快戰鬥後,奪取了加丹加省首都,伊莉莎白城(現在稱盧本巴希),然後剛果的中央政府宣佈從分離主義者手上收復該省。"美國總統及參議院毫無疑問地有放棄某些我們的權力及主權給聯合國。然後計劃更多。"

Any informed American is aware that ARTICLE IV, Section 4, of the

Constitution automatically cancels out any allegiance to the U.N. and its

alien one-world Internationalism, the antithesis of Constitutional

Americanism founded on Washington's "NO foreign entanglements."

And that said republican representative form of government is the exact

opposite of the U.N. Charter's Soviet-initiated modifications, restrictions,

and reservations in its various "Conventions"which would nullify our Bill

of Rights. Stalin, his protege, Alger Hiss, and Russian Communist Pasvolsky

figured largely in the writing of the U.N. Charter.

任何知情的美國人都知道憲法第4條第4款,會自動取消任何,對於聯合國及其外來的單一世界國際主義的忠誠(相反於合憲的美國精神,華盛頓創立的"無外國糾纏"),而這說明共和國的政府形式是完全與聯合國相反的。聯合國憲章(由蘇聯發起、修改、限制、保留)在其底下的各種"大會",將會廢止我們的權力法案。史達林、他的門徒Alger Hiss俄羅斯共產黨員Pasvolsky是聯合國憲章的主要執筆者。

To assume that a heterogeneous body composed of appointed representatives

of foreign governments (some from crude cannibalisticso-called

"States" and others, from virulently atheistic Communist States) — which

Governments DO NOT REPRESENT "We the AmericanPeople" — could

exercise dictation and control over U.S. is monstrous in the extreme. Lawfully

or constitutionally, they may not enforce any provisions of the U.N. Charter against us, or take any action whatever affecting the Sovereign

Rights of American Citizens.

假設外國政府委任的代表是由混雜的人組成(一些來自粗俗的食人族,稱為所謂的"國家",還有其他來自惡毒的無神論共產國家)-這些政府們並不代表"我們美國人民"-可以命令及控制聯合國,這是極度怪異的。從合法性及憲法上來說,他們不能對我們執行任何聯合國憲章的規定,或者做出任合影響至高美國公民權力的行為。

Further, the United Nations is not a lawful government in the accepted

sense of the term and is not a proper body with which to make a treaty.

Actually, the U.N. has NO valid binding treaty-making power — except as

the subversive one-worlders try to make it so. Quoting Norton's Constitution

of the United States, at page 14: "A treaty is a written contract between

two governments (not a motley assembly of unstable tribes, or enslaved

peoples calling themselves a 'government') respecting matters of mutual

welfare, such as peace, the acouisition of territory, the defining of boundaries,

the needs of trade, rights of citizenship..." etc.

此外,聯合國在這術語的意義,公認不是一個合法政府,它不是個能做出條約的適當機構。事實上,聯合國沒有制訂條約的權力-除了那些從事顛覆工作的單一世界份子,試圖讓它如此。引用諾頓(Norton)美國憲法的第14頁:"條約是個在兩政府間,關於彼此福利的書寫合同(不是個不穩定部落的叢雜集合,或者被奴役的人們自稱為一個'政府'),像是和平、領土獲取、邊界界定、貿易需求、公民權...."等....

And such treaties, even though "legally made,"MAY be abrogated for

cause. Quoting ibid, p. 115: "A precedent for thus abrogating a treaty made

by the President and approved by the Senate may be found as far back as

July 7, 1789, when Congress passed 'An Act to Declare the Treaties

heretofore concluded with France no longer obligatory on the United States

because they have been repeatedly violated on the part of the French

government." So what about all the violations of the treaties or agreements

made by the USSR, which dominates the U.N.? The USA is vastly

outvoted in this motley aggregation called the United Nations, even as

American taxpayers foot most of the bills, which constitutes Constitutionally

forbidden confiscation of the citizens' money (property)without just

compensation therefore. This is merely communistic confiscation.

而這些甚至是"合法"的條約,也可能因為一些原因被廢止。引用同上,115頁:"一個廢除條約的先例是,早在1789年7月7號,由總統經過參議院准許廢止,當國會通過'宣布條約法'後,過去與法國締結的條約,美國將不在有義務遵守,因為他們已經遭法國政府多次侵犯。"而那這些所有由蘇聯制定的侵犯條約或協議,而它又支配著聯合國呢?美國是巨大的雜色聚合的聯合國家,由美國納稅人支付大多數的帳單,而這組成憲法上禁止沒收公民的錢(財產)而沒支付賠償金。因此,這僅僅是共產式的沒收。

A Treaty made "pursuant to the Constitution"becomes A PART of the

LAW OF THE LAND, and should be honored; but it does NOT become

"Supreme" or take precedence over nor supersede the Constitution. It is

NOT the "Law of the Land" standing alone. And NO Treaty or Executive

Agreement is binding on the USA if made by the President alone (as has

been done) with the advice and consent of the Senate, nor if it violates the

Constitution.

一個"根據憲法"制定的條約,會成為國內法(LAW OF THE LAND)的一部分,而且得到榮耀;但它不會是"至高"或優先於憲法。它不是唯一的"國內法"。而且如果單單由總統制定(已經這麼做),並且在參議院的建議及同意下的條約或行政協議,都對美國沒有約束力,就算它不違反憲法。

Actually, ARTICLE VI, instead of setting Treaties on high or being a

"death trap," is a statement of the SUPREMACY OF THE CONSTITUTION

and of the NATIONAL GOVERNMENT. Lawful Treaties are apart

of, but subordinate to, the Constitution for the simple stated provision

therein that ALL laws and treaties must be made "in pursuance thereof."

事實上,憲法第六條,如果替代這些形容用語,像來自上級的設定條約,或一個死亡陷阱,那是一個憲法至高地位國家政府的陳述,合法的條約是從屬憲法的一部分,憲法它的簡單陳述規定,所有法律及條約必須"以此"制定。

Can the "creature" (or a part) become greater than its CREATOR, or

the whole??? Some American common sense is necessary in all this blather

about the supremacy of treaties, which is promulgated largely by the

one-worlders to discredit or diminish the Constitution so they can achieve

their own ends.

"被創造物"(或部分)能比其創造者,或整體更強大嗎? 條約享有至高地位,這句話如同廢話般,一些美國常識是必須的,這條約頒布大量的單一世界措施,去詆毀或削弱憲法,所以他們能完成他們的目的。

The language and intent of the Constitution and of ARTICLE VI is

clear and forthright, and does not admit, in good faith,of any other interpretation.

But sadly enough, it is well known that many of our highest

judiciary and elected officials — in this era of TREASON,not Reason — do

not act in good faith nor in "pursuance of the Constitution."

憲法第六條的意圖是清楚且爽快的,在其他任何解釋裡沒找到承認、真誠。更可悲的是,許多著名的最高法院法官及選舉官員-是背叛、不合理的-行為不真誠也不"根據憲法"。

With reference to fourth paragraph your letter Oct. 12th,Mr. Newby,

that the "making of treaties is without limitation,exception or reservation"

and that "no treaty has ever been declared unconstitutional or invalidated

or repealed by the Courts or Congress in the history of this nation," I think

that the foregoing invalidates your statement.

參考你在10月12號的信第4段,紐比先生,"制定條約是沒有限制、例外、保留的"還有"沒有條約在本國曾被宣佈說是違憲或無效或由法院或國會廢止"我想我上述的已經破除你的陳述了。

And as to ARTICLE VI being a "deathtrap" over which the Constitution

gives no control or remedy other than its explicit language in VI

regarding the law and treaties: has it occurred to you that the Supreme

Court has power and authority to rule on the constitutionality of treaties

the same as on the constitutionality of any other law —treaties being

merely "part of the Law of the Land"? ARTICLE III, Section 2 explicitly

states: "The Judicial power shall extend to all cases, in Law and Equity,

arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and treaties

made, or which shall be made, under their authority."

而憲法第六條成為一個"死亡陷阱",使憲法無法控制或補救,因其第六條上,有法律及條約這明確的語言。最高法院有權去判定合條約的憲性,同樣的對於任何法律的合憲性-這樣有使你發現條約僅僅是"國內法的一部分"?憲法第3條第2款明確規定:"司法權的適用範圍包括:由於本憲法、合眾國法律和根據合眾國權力已締結或將締結的條約而產生的一切普通法和衡平法的案件。"

To quote Norton's

Constitution of the United States, page 137: "When a case arises in a State

court and involves a question of the Constitution, or an Act of Congress, or

of a treaty, it is the duty of the court to follow and enforce the National

[Constitional] law; for the Constitution explicitly andemphatically requires

that the 'judges in every State shall be bound thereby,anything in

the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding.'"

Any time that the President and Senate make a treaty with a foreign

power (such as the U.N.) which infringes upon or abrogates rights guaranteed

citizens of the USA under the Constitution, the Supreme Court can

declare such treaty unconstitutional, void, and of no effect. Of course, the

present Supreme Court, being composed of political radicals rather than

judicial Constitutional experts, is not likely to take such action — unless

forced to do so by public opinion and demand.

引用諾頓的美國憲法,137頁:"當國家法院遇到包含憲法的問題,或國會立法,或條約,法院的責任是遵循及執行國家法[憲法];因為憲法明白地且強調地要求"每個州的法官都應受其約束,即使州的憲法和法律中有與之相牴觸的內容。""任何時候總統及參議院與國外力量(像聯合國)做出條約,侵犯或廢除憲法對美國公民所作的權力保證,最高法院可以宣佈這樣子的條約違憲,廢止及無效。當然,現在的最高法院已經被政治激進份子佔據,而不是公正擁護憲法的專家,所以不太可能會採取這樣的行動-直到被輿論要求強迫這麼做為止。

And so, with reference to your statement in printed CHALLENGE for

November, 1961, to the effect that, "under ARTICLEII, Section 2, clause 2

of the Constitution...such treaty (as with the U.N.) can be made without

restriction, limitation, exception or reservation irrespective of the fact that

it contravenes, violates, infringes or alienates every article of the Constitution.

所以根據你1961年11月的陳述挑戰你:"在憲法第2條第2款第2節....這樣的條約(像跟聯合國)可以不需限制、局限、例外或保留,不管它確實有違反、違背、侵犯、沒收憲法裡的每一條"。

All that is necessary is for the President and Senate to ratify ANY

treaty and it is in force." The above article and clause likewise does not

stand alone, but must be construed in the light of the entire Constitution.

YOUR interpretation is not only to make idiots of the Founding Fathers

and Framers of the Constitution, but to say that regardless of the solemn

Presidential oath of allegiance required by ARTICLE III,Section 2a, regardless

of the SUPREME SOVEREIGNTY of the U.S. Constitution, and in

violation of the explicit language contained in ARTICLE VI, i.e., "THIS

CONSTITUTION, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in

pursuance thereof; and all treaties...under the authority of the United

States...," as well as all authoritative rulings by genuine Constitutional

authorities to the effect that anything which contravenes the Constitution

of the USA is null and void, including any such acts by the Congress;

despite all of the foregoing. I reiterate that YOUR interpretation would

claim that there is absolutely NO constitutional safeguard for the American

People against TREASONOUS treaties (which "gives aid and comfort to

our enemies" as per ARTICLE III, Section 3).

"所有需要做的只是總統及參議院批准,然後就生效了。"以上文章及條文也不是獨立的,必須按照整部憲法解釋。你的解釋不僅愚弄了國父及憲法的創立者,也無視憲法第2條第1款第8節要求的總統就職誓詞,無視美國憲法至高主權,侵犯憲法第6條上的明確語言"本憲法和依本憲法所制定的合眾國法律;所有條約....在合眾國權力下...."以及真正憲法所裁斷的全部權威性,以致所有任何違反美國憲法的東西都是無效及廢止的,包含任何國會此類之行為;儘管所有前述的。我重申,你的解釋將宣稱美國民眾對於不忠的條約("這援助及舒適我們敵人"見憲法第3條第3款),完全無憲法上保障。

YOUR interpretation would give complete IMMUNITY to the

maker...of such treaties and would constitute"changing the Constitution

by usurpation" in violation of the intent, spirit,AND letter of the Constitution

as a whole.

你的解釋將會給那些條約的制訂者,完全的抵抗力,並且構成"透過篡奪改變憲法",違反憲法的意圖、精神、條文,全部。

The President obviously is NOT a "free agent"by virtue of ARTICLE

II, Section 2, clause 2, to make any sort of treaty he would like, but is

BOUND DOWN by the chains of the entire Constitution.Nothing else

makes any sense. His treaty-making acts are subject to review by the

Courts.

總統顯然不是個"自由權力的人",依照憲法第2條第2款第2節,他可做任何他想做的條約,但受到整個憲法鏈條的束縛。沒有其他理由。他條約制訂行為必須受到法院審查。

True, we SHOULD DEMAND rescinding of the action by both Senate

and Harry S. Truman in signing the U.N. Participation Act of 1945 in behalf

of the USA. This would put the World on notice that we were once more

HONORING OUR OWN CONSTITUTION (CHARTER OF FREEDOM)

AS THE SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND, AND REINSTATING IT TO ITS

FORMER PROPER SUPREME POSITION: as well as reclaiming our

Sovereignty as an Independent Republic in accordance with our Declaration

of Independence.

當然我們應該要求廢除,由參議院及杜魯門所共同簽署的1945年聯合國參與法,這將使世界注意到我們再次榮耀我們憲法(自由憲章),作為國土上的至高法律,恢復它先前適當的至高位置:以及根據我們的獨立宣言,作為一個獨立共和國,收回我們的主權。

There is not nor ever will be any true Peace, Freedom,Safety or

Security for the American People under the alien U.N.Charter.

There is "NO SUBSTITUTE" for American Independence. Many men

have died and "worms have eaten them" for a far lesser Cause.

And so, Mr. Newby, you and I do have one primary objective in view:

GET THE U.S. OUT OF THE U.N., AND THE SUBVERSIVE U.N. OUT OF

THE USA!

Most sincerely yours,

Marilyn R. Allen

美國人民在外來的聯合國憲章下,將不會有任何真正和平、自由、安全、保障。美國獨立沒有任何的替代品。許多男人已經死亡,"蠕蟲已經吃了他們"因為一個極小的原因。所以,紐比先生,你跟我看起來有個主要目標:把聯合國趕出美國,當一位在美國的聯合國顛覆份子!

最真誠你的

瑪莉蓮.艾倫

I guess that just about covers the U.N. Charter vs. U.S.sovereignty hoax. No

one should ever be able to bullshit you on this issue again. Your job now is to

make sure your Congressmen and Senators are educated on this issue.

GET TO WORK — NOW!

我猜這就是掩護聯合國憲章對上美國主權的騙術。沒有人曾有能力在你的論點上,多次對你放屁。你現在的工作是確保你眾、參議員在此議題上,有受過教育。

現在馬上行動!

---------------------第13章完---------------------------------

TOP

本帖最後由 awepp 於 2017-10-23 14:12 編輯

我看到了一位老師對台灣女權(不是正常的女權!特別強調)的看法,讓我非常驚訝!絕對是我看過最精闢、精準的論述。因為還沒得到當事人同意,所以我大概轉述內容。

女權主義最終形態是消滅性別,這跟共產主義消滅私產一樣,是很激進的意識形態。
這些激進份子經過了共產主義失敗,已經學到躁進的教訓,一步一步,用自由、平等
、愛來包裝,滲透進校園、媒體、政府,表面是這樣,實際上刻意隱藏其黑暗面,
許多國家都已經淪陷,反對者就會被冠上性別歧視、反人權的帽子,常聽的其中理由
是各國都這樣,我們不做就是落後。
那些納粹份子、蘇聯的共產份子都去哪了呢?都消失了嗎?如同黑色貴族,如果我們
都以為那些人已經消失,並且遺忘,那真的是大錯特錯!
聯合國的終極目標就是單一世界政府,憲章的起草人是蘇聯的共產份子。雅爾達會議促成聯合國的形成,會議參與者是羅斯福、邱吉爾、史達林。
(會員國要遵守大會決議,這個每個人聽起來都像廢話的話,這規定就會造成
每個國家推行的政策越來越一致,最終實質上聯合國成為單一世界政府)

感覺上蘇聯的解體代表著時機點已到,可退場,進入下個階段?

一個問題是,中華民國不是會員國,但是當時國民黨政府有代表在憲章上簽字,這樣
對中華民國有沒有約束力?
台灣女權、同志權益目前已經在世界名列前茅,未來實在令人憂心。

TOP

本帖最後由 awepp 於 2017-11-7 09:44 編輯
第二階段會議也是在維吉尼亞州Quantico召開,這小組被稱為Quantico II。尼爾森洛克裴勒在馬里蘭某處為MJ12和 ...
erwincdw 發表於 2017-9-15 19:12
方案1是使用核子裝置在平流層炸出一個洞,讓熱氣和污染從洞口散逸至太空,他們再想辦法改變人類文化,從剝削式開發轉變為環境保護(註3)。三個方案中,此項被認為最不可能成功,因為人類的本質,及核子爆炸所帶來的附加傷害。現在臭層的破洞也許就是此方案造成的,當然這只是推測(註4)。
這位網友以解釋了溫室效應的原因!!!實在震撼!艾森豪在位的時間1953~1961:
1234.jpg
2017-11-5 20:01

縱坐標是 工業化前溫度(未詳細具名)與當年差,可知大概從1970左右(或更早些),溫度開始向上飆升。所以一定是1970年以前發生了某件事造成。
核爆竟是造成全球暖化的元凶!愚民非常徹底。所以真相應該是方案123都推動了。
http://www.phy.ntnu.edu.tw/demolab/phpBB/viewtopic.php?topic=27939

TOP


Chapter 14

A PROPOSED

CONSTITUTIONAL

MODEL FOR THE

NEWSTATES OF

AMERICA

新美國的一個建議憲法模型

Prepared Over a 10-Year Period

by the

Center for Democratic Studies

of Santa Barbara, California,

at a Total Cost to the

United States Taxpayers of

Over $25 Million

加州,聖塔芭芭拉,民主研究中心準備超過10年

美國納稅人總花費超過2500萬美元




A PROPOSED CONSTITUTIONAL MODEL FOR THE NEWSTATES OFAMERICA

一個新美國的憲法建議模型。

PREAMBLE

So that we may join in common endeavors, welcome thefuture in good order, and create an adequate

and self-repairing government - we, the people, doestablish the Newstates of America, herein provided

to be ours, and do ordain this Constitution whose supremelaw it shall be until the time prescribed for it

shall have run.

ARTICLE I

Rights and Responsibilities

前言

讓我們共同努力,在完善秩序下迎接未來,並創造一個勝任及自我修復的政府,我們,人民,建立了新美國,以及我們的最高法-憲法,直到規定時間到期才失效。

第一章

權力與責任

A.權力

A. Rights

SECTION 1.. Freedom of expression, of communication, ofmovement, of assembly, or of petition

shall not be abridged except in declared emergency.

第一節。言論、通訊、行動、集會、請願的自由,除了在宣佈緊急狀態下,不可削減。

SECTION 2. Access to information possessed bygovernmental agencies shall not be denied except in

interest of national security; but communications among officialsnecessary to decision making shall be

be privileged.

第二節。除了國家安全利益外,不可拒絕政府機關的資訊取得;但官員間因做決策所必要之通訊,則享有特權。

SECTION 3. Public communicators may decline to revealsources of information, but shall be

responsible for hurtful disclosures.

第三節。公眾傳播者可以拒絕透露資訊來源,但有責揭露有害資訊。

SECTION 4. The privacy of individuals shall be respected;searches and seizures shall be made only

on judicial warrant; persons shall be pursued orquestioned only for the prevention of crime or the

apprehension of suspected criminals, and only accordingto rules established under law.

第四節。尊重個人隱私;只有在司法授權令下才可進行搜索及扣押;個人只在預防犯罪或對犯罪嫌疑人的顧慮下,才可進行追捕或訊問,並按照法律規定下的規則。

SECTION 5. There shall be no discrimination because ofrace, creed, color, origin, or sex. The

Court of Rights and Responsibilities may determinewhether selection for various occupations has been

discriminatory.

第五節。不得因種族、信仰、膚色、出身、或性別而受到歧視。法院的權力及責任可決定各種工作是否是歧視性的。

SECTION 6. All persons shall have equal protection of thelaws, and in all electoral procedures the

vote of every eligible citizen shall count equally withothers.

第六節。所有民眾享有平等的法律保護,在所有選舉程序中,所有符合條件的公民票票等值。

SECTION 7. It shall be public policy to promotediscussion of public issues and to encourage peaceful

public gatherings for this purpose. Permission to holdsuch gatherings shall not be denied, nor shall

they be interrupted, except in decalred emergency or on ashowing of imminent danger to public order

and on judicial warrant.

第七節。公共政策應該促進公共議題的討論,和鼓勵和平的公共集會。不可拒絕這樣的集會申請,也不可被打斷,除了在宣佈緊急狀態,或顯示出一個即將為害公共秩序的跡象,或司法授權令。

SECTION 8. The practice of religion shall be privileged;but no religion shall be imposed by some on

others, and none shall have public support.

第八節。宗教行為應該是享有特權的;但沒有宗教可強加他人,且得到公開支持。

SECTION 9. Any citizen may purchase, sell, lease, hold,convey and inherit real and personal

property, and shall benefit equally from all laws forsecurity in such transactions.

第九節。任何公民都可以購買、出售、出租、持有、運輸及繼承房地產和個人財產,這些交易在所有安全法律下效益平等。

SECTION 10. Those who cannot contribute to productivityshall be entitled to a share of the national

product; but distribution shall be fair and the total maynot exceed the amount for this purpose held in

the National Sharing Fund.

第十節。那些無法對生產力做出貢獻的人,應有資格享有國家產品;但分配須公平,且總量不可超過為此目的而生的國家共享基金。

SECTION 11. Education shall be provided at public expensefor those who meet appropriate tests of

eligibility.

第十一節。教育應該提供那些通過適當考試及格的人獎學金。

SECTION 12. No person shall be deprived of life, liberty,or property without due process of law. No

property shall be taken without compensation.

第十二節。沒有人可在沒有正當法律程序下,被剝奪生命、自由、或財產。沒有財產被沒收後而沒補償。

SECTION 13. Legislatures shall define crimes andconditions requiring restraint, but confinement

shall not be for punishment; and, when possible, thereshall be preparation for return to freedom.

第十三節。立法機構應該定義犯罪和情況需求限制,但監禁不可用來當作處罰;並在可能的情況下,做好回歸自由的準備。

SECTION 14. No person shall be placed twice in jeopardyfor the same offense.

第十四節。沒有人在同一罪行而受到兩次處罰。

SECTION 15. Writs of habeas corpus shall not be suspendedexcept in declared emergency.

第十五節。除非在緊急情況,否則人身保護令不得中止

SECTION 16. Accused persons shall be informed of chargesagainst them, shall have a speedy trial,

shall have reasonable bail, shall be allowed to confrontwitnesses or to call others, and shall not be

compelled to testify against themselves; at the time ofarrest they shall be informed of their right to be

silent and to have counsel, provided, if necessary, atpublic expense; and courts shall consider the

contention that prosecution may be under an invalid orunjust statue.

第十六節。被告應該被告知對他們的指控,應迅速審判,應合理保釋,應允許與證人對質或打電話,不可逼迫他們證明自己;當逮捕他們時,應告知他們有權保持沉默以及有辯護人的權力,提供,以公共費用支付,如有需要的話;且法院需要考量一個情況是,檢察官處於無能或不公的情況下。

TOP

回復 216# awepp

我看了這篇文章,作者從物理專業角度探討這個問題,得出的結論竟然和Cooper的相符,值得重視。我以前也不知道美蘇在大氣層有過那麼多次的核子試爆 ! 當然會造成傷害,他們卻轉移焦點,歸咎於二氧化碳排放,並以此為藉口推動碳稅機制。


王大師這陣子提的軍購弊案,他暗示這可能和SSP有關,老美搞 SSP除了自謀黑資金外,也動手向各國勒索,各國政府不得不用各種非手段提供資金,偶爾不小心會爆出冰山一角。我覺得這觀點很有可能是對的,Goode提到過SSP中有一派叫什麼國家聯盟,地球各國幾乎全有參與,但只能接觸到最低階的小玩意,讓他們啃啃狗骨頭好閉上嘴巴。雖然這堣ㄚHGoode,但這一點倒是很有可能是真的。

TOP

B.責任

B. Responsibilities

SECTION 1. Each freedom of the citzen shall prescribe acorresponding responsibility not to diminish

that of others: of speech, communication, assembly, andpetition, to grant the same freedom to others;

of religion, to respect that of others; of privacy, notto invade that of others; of the holding and disposal

of property, the obligation to extend the same privilegeto others.

第一節。每項公民的自由都應規定,對其他人相應不減的責任:言論、通訊、集會及請願自由,同樣適用於他人;尊重他人宗教信仰;不侵犯他人隱私;人人都享有持有及處置財產的基本人權。

SECTION 2. Individuals and enterprises holding themselvesout to serve the public shall serve all

equally and without intention to misrepresent, conformingto such standards as may improve health

and welfare.

第二節。個人及企業服務大眾者,應平等且不可意圖歪曲,須符合改善健康及福利這樣的標準。

SECTION 3. Protection of the law shall be repaid byassistance in its enforcement; this shall include

respect for the procedures of justice, apprehension oflawbreakers, and testimony at trial.

第三節。應藉由強制執法來保護法律;應包含尊重司法程序,拘捕不法份子,審判講究證據。

SECTION 4. Each citizen shall participate in theprocesses of democracy, assisting in the selection

of officials and in the monitoring of their conduct inoffice.

第四節。每位公民都應參與民主進程,協助選拔官員及監督他們的行為。

SECTION 5. Each shall render such services to the nationas may be uniformly required by law,

objection by reason of conscience being adjudicated ashereinafter provided; and none shall expect or

may receive special privileges unless they be for apublic purpose defined by law.

第五節。每位公民應該捐贈一些服務給國家,應由法律統一要求,除了以下給出的因素外不可拒絕;那些由法律定義的公共目的工作者。

SECTION 6. Each shall pay whatever share of governmentalcosts is consistent with fairness to all.

第六節。每項政府花費都必須始終如一地對所有人公平。

SECTION 7. Each shall refuse awards or titles from othernations or their representatives except as

they be authorized by law.

第七節。每位公民應拒絕來自其他國家,或其代表人的獎勵或頭銜,除了他們得到法律授權。

SECTION 8. There shall be a responsibility to avoidviolence and to keep the peace; for this reason

the bearing of arms or the possession of lethal weaponsshall be confined to the police, members of the

armed forces, and those licensed under law.

第八節。應有責任去避免暴力及保持和平的責任;因這原因,擁槍權或致命武器所有權,應限於警察、軍隊及合法擁有執照者。

SECTION 9. Each shall assist in preserving the endowmentsof nature and enlarging the inheritance

of future generations.

第九節。每個人應致力於保留自然天賦,及為後代打拼。

SECTION 10. Those granted the use of public lands, theair, or waters shall have a responsibility for

using these resources so that, if irreplaceable, they areconserved and, if replaceable, they are put back

as they were.

第十節。那些公共土地、空氣、水,應對使用這些資源有個責任,如果不可取代,則保留;如果可取代,他們維持原樣。

SECTION 11. Retired officers of the armed forces, of thesenior civil service, and of the Senate shall

regard their service as a permanent obligation and shallnot engage in enterprise seeking profit from the

government.

第十一節。退休軍官、高級公務員、參議員,應視其服務為永久義務,不可在政府裡從事利潤尋求。

SECTION 12. The devising or controlling of devices formanagement or technology shall establish

responsibility for resulting costs.

第十二節。設計或控制,管理或技術設備,應建立損害責任。

SECTION 13. All rights and responsibilities definedherein shall extend to such associations of

citizens as may be authorized by law.

第十三節。所有於此定義的權力及責任,應拓展至合法的公民社團。

TOP

ARTICLE II

The Newstates

SECTION 1. There shall be Newstates, each comprising noless than 5 percent of the whole

population. Existing states may continue and may have thestatus of Newstates if the Boundary

Commission, hereinafter provided, shall so decide. TheCommission shall be guided in its

recommendations by the probability of accommodation tothe conditions for effective government.

States electing by referendum to continue if theCommission recommend otherwise shall nevertheless

except all Newstate obligations.

第二章

新合眾國

第一節。每個新合眾國的組成州,不低於全部人口的5%。現有的州可能繼續,也可能調整,如果邊界委員會如此決定的話(以下給出),委員會應給予建議,為了提升政府效率。如果委員會建議,州的公民選舉繼續進行,否則不進行,但所有新美國的義務不在此限。

SECTION 2. The Newstates shall have constitutionsformulated and adopted by processes

hereinafter prescribed.

第二節。新合眾國應有憲法制訂,並經由程序採納,下文規定。

SECTION 3. They shall have Governors; legislatures, andplanning administrative and

judicial systems.

第三節。他們有統治者;立法機關,及行政規劃和司法系統。

SECTION 4. Their political procedures shall be organizedand supervised by electoral Overseers; but

their elections shall not be in years of presidentialelection.

第四節。他們的政治程序應由選舉監察員組織及監督;他們的選舉不可與總統選舉年相同。

SECTION 5. The electoral apparatus of the Newstates ofAmerica shall be available to them, and

they may be allotted funds under rules agreed to by thenational Overseer; but expenditures may not be

made by for any candidate except they be approved by theOverseer; and requirements of residence

in a voting district shall be no longer than thirty days.

第五節。他們應有個新美國選舉機構,他們可以分配經費在國家監察員同意的規定下,但候選人不可做為自己的支出,除非監察員允許,且不可居住於投票區內超過30天。

SECTION 6. They may charter subsidiary governments, urbanor rural, and may delegate to them

powers appropriate to their responsibilities.

第六節。他們可以特許設立城市或農村的子政府,並依他們的責任賦予他們權力。

SECTION 7. They may lay, or may delegate the laying of,taxes; but these shall conform to the

restraints stated hereinafter for the Newstates ofAmerica.

第七節。他們可設置或委託設置稅收,但這些應符合以下的限制。

SECTION 8. They may not tax exports, may not tax withintent to prevent imports, and may not

impose any tax forbidden by laws of the Newstates ofAmerica; but the objects appropriate for taxation

shall be clearly designated.

第八節。他們不可徵出口稅,不可徵意圖阻止進口的稅,不可藉由立法禁止任何徵稅;徵稅對象應明確給出。

SECTION 9. Taxes on land may be at higher rates thanthose on its improvements.

第九節。地價稅率應高於那些改進的稅率。

SECTION 10. They shall be responsible for theadministration of public services not reserved to the

government of the Newstates of America, such activitiesbeing concerted with those of corresponding

national agencies, where these exist, under arrangementscommon to all.

第十節。他們應對管理那些新美國政府,沒有負責的公共服務有責任,這些活動與所有存在的國家機構協力,在安排下,所有人適用。

SECTION 11. The rights and responsibilities prescribed inthis Constitution shall be effective in the

Newstates and shall be suspended only in emergency whendeclared by Governors and not disapproved

by the Senate of the Newstates of America.

第十一節。本憲法所規定的權力及義務,在新美國是有效的,只在統治者宣稱在緊急情況,且新美國參議院沒有不同意下中止。

SECTION 12. Police powers of the Newstates shall extendto all matters not reserved to the

Newstates of America; but preempted powers shall not beimpaired.

第十二節。新美國的警察權力應延伸至所有國家無負責之事物;且先發制人權力不可削減。

SECTION 13. Newstates may not enter into any treaty,alliance, confederation, or agreement unless

approved by the Boundary Commission hereinafter provided.

They may not coin money, provide for the payment of debtsin any but legal tender, or make any

charge for inter-Newstate services. They may not enact expost facto laws or ones impairing the

obligation of contracts.

第十三節。新美國不可簽署任何條約、聯合、聯盟、協議,除非經下文所述的情況,邊界委員會准許。

除法令准許,他們不可創造貨幣支付債務,或與新美國間的服務作收費。他們不可制定有溯及力的法律,

或任一方 妨礙合約義務。

SECTION 14. Newstates may not impose barriers to importsfrom other jurisdictions or impose any

hindrance to citizens' freedom of movement.

第十四節。新美國不可對其他管轄權設置進口障礙,或妨礙公民的行動自由。

SECTION 15. If governments of the Newstates fail to carryout fully their constitutional duties, their

officials shall be warned and may be required by theSenate, on the recommendationof the Watchkeeper,

to forfeit revenues from the Newstates of America.

第十五節。如果新美國政府無法履行憲法責任,他們官員應收到警告,並在參議院要求下,根據守護人的建議,沒收其在新美國的收入。

TOP

ARTICLE III

The Electoral Branch

第3章

選舉部門

SECTION 1. To arrange for participation by the electoratein the determination of policies and the

selection of officials, there shall be an ElectoralBranch.

第一節。為安排選民參與政策決定、選拔官員,應有個選舉部門。

SECTION 2. An Overseer of electoral procedures shall bechosen by majority of the Senate and may

be removed by a two-thirds vote. It shall be theOverseer's duty to supervise the organization of

national and district parties, arrange for discussionamong them, and provide for the nomination and

election of candidates for public office. While in officethe Overseer shall belong to no political

organization; and after each presidential election shalloffer to resign.

第二節。選舉監察人應由參議院多數決選出,並可被2/3票數罷免。監察人的責任是監察國家及地區政黨、安排議論、提名候選人及舉辦選舉。在職的監察人不可屬於任何政治組織;並在每次總統選舉完後辭職。

SECTION 3. A national party shall be one having had atleast a 5 percent affiliation in the latest

general election; but a new party shall be recognizedwhen valid petitions have been signed by at least 2

percent of the voters in each of 30 percent of thedistricts drawn for the House of Representatives.

Recognition shall be suspended upon failure to gain 5percent of the votes at a second election, 10

percent at a third, or 15 percent at further elections.

第三節。國家政黨應該至少參與5%的一般選舉;眾議院的30%選區中得到2%的選票,那新政黨應得到承認。應該中止承認,如果第二輪票數不能得到超過5%,第三輪10%,之後15%。

District parties shall be recognized when at least 2percent of voters shall have signed petitions of

affiliation; but recognition shall be withdrawn uponfailure to attract the same percentages as are

neccessary for the continuance of national parties.

地區政黨當得到至少2%的選票時應獲承認,但如果未能跟國家政黨得到相同%數,則予以撤銷,作為國家政黨繼存的必要條件。

SECTION 4. Recognition by the Overseer shall bringparties within established regulations and

entitle them to common privileges.

第四節。監察員的承認,應給政黨在既定的規定及給予他們相同的特權下。

SECTION 5. The Overseer shall promulgate rules for partyconduct and shall see that fair practices

are maintained, and for this purpose shall appointdeputies in each district and shall supervise the

choice, in district and national conventions, of partyadministrators. Regulations and appointments

may be objected to by the Senate.

第五節。監察員應頒布行為規則給政黨,並應看到它公平的執行,為此目的,應指派責任給每個地區,並在地區及國家大會上監督黨主席的選擇。規則及任命可受到參議院的反對。

SECTION 6. The Overseer, with the administrator and otherofficials, shall:

a. Provide the means for discussion, in each party, ofpublic issues, and for this purpose, ensure that

members have adequate facilities for participation.

第六節。監察員,和主席及其他官員應:

a.提供公共議題議論的工具給每個政黨,為此目的,確保成員們有足夠的能力參與。

b. Arrange for discussion, in annual district meetings, ofthe President's views, of the findings of the

Planning Branch, and such other information as may bepertinent for the enlightened political

discussion.

b.安排會談,在年度地區會議,在總統的意見下、在規畫部門的裁決下,以及其他,對於啟發政治議題是恰當的。

c. Arrange, on the first Saturday in each month, forenrollment, valid for one year, of voters at

convenient places.

c.安排在方便地方登記選民,在每個月第一個禮拜六,有效期一年。

SECTION 7. The Overseer shall also:

a. Assist the parties in nominating candidates fordistrict members of the House of Representatives

each three years; and for this purpose designate onehundred districts, each with a similar number of

eligible voters, redrawing districts after each election.In these there shall be party conventions having

no more than three hundred delegates, so distributed thatrepresentation of voters be approximately

equal.

第七節。監察員也應該:

a.協助政黨每3年提名眾議院候選人,為此目的,劃分100個有相似數量選民的區域,每次選舉完後重新劃分。政黨大會不應有超過300名代表,如此分配,選民的代表大約是相同的。

Candidates for delegate may become eligible by presentingpetitions signed by two hundred registered

voters. They shall be elected by party members on thefirst Tuesday in March, those having the largest

number of votes being chosen until the three hundred becomplete. Ten alternates shall also be chosen

by the same process.

候選代表可經200個註冊選民聯署產生。他們由黨員們在3月第一個星期2選舉。由最高票者勝出,直到300人選出為止。10位候補應在同個過程選出。

District conventions shall be held on the first Tuesdayin April. Delegates shall choose three

candidates for membership in the House ofRepresentatives, the three having the most votes becoming

candidates.

地區大會應在4月第1個星期2舉辦。代表應選出3位眾議院候選人,3位最高票者。

b .Arrange for the election each three years of threemembers of the House of Representatives in each

district from among the candidates chosen in partyconventions, the three having the most votes to be

elected.

b.安排每個地區每3年1次的,眾議院3名候選人的選舉,經由政黨大會選出,3位得最高票者勝出。

SECTION 8. The Overseer shall also:

第八節。監察人也應該:

a. Arrange for national conventions to meet nine yearsafter previous presidential elections, with an

equal number of delegates from each district, the wholenumber not to exceed one thousand.

Candidates for delegates shall be eligible when petitionssigned by five hundred registered voters have

been filed. Those with the most votes, together with twoalternates, being those next in number of

votes, shall be chosen in each district.

在上次總統大選9年後,安排國家大會,每個地區有相同數量的代表,總數不能超過1000。代表候選人應該成立,當有500註冊選民完成連署。每地區的那些最高票者,和兩位候補者,進入下輪選舉。

b. Approve procedures in these conventions for choosingone hundred candidates to be members-atlarge

of the House of Representatives, whose terms shall becoterminous with that of the President.

For this purpose delegates shall file one choice withconvention officials. Voting on submissions shall

proceed until one hundred achieve 10 percent, but notmore than three candidates may be resident in

any one district; if any district have more than three,those with the fewest votes shall be eliminated,

others being added from the districts having less thanthree, until equality be reached. Of those added,

those having the most votes shall be chosen first.

b.為選出100位不分區眾議員,批准大會程序,選舉日期應與總統選舉一致。為此目的,代表應與大會官員一起提出一個選擇。呈遞表決應持續直到100人完成10%,但不可超過3位候選人居住在任一地區;如果超過3人,他們應與最少票者一起汰除,位置由少於他們的人替補,直到達到100人,大原則是那些最高票者先錄取。

c. Arrange procedures for the consideration and approvalof party objectives by the convention.

c.安排程序,在大會上,審議及批准政黨目標。

d. Formulate rules for the nomination in theseconventions of candidates for President and Vice

Presidents when the offices are to fall vacant,candidates for nomination to be recognized when petitions

shall have been presented by one hundred or moredelegates, pledged to continue support until

candidates can no longer win or until they consent towithdraw. Presidents and Vice-Presidents,

together with Representatives-at-large, shall submit toreferendum after serving for three years, and if

they are rejected, new conventions shall be held withinone month and candidates shall be chosen as for

vacant offices. Candidates for President andVice-Presidents shall be nominated on attaining a majority.

d.當正副總統候選人缺位時,為這些大會制訂提名規則,當候選人得到100位或更多的代表,承諾持續支持,直到他無法贏或撤出為止,那麼提名應獲得承認。正副總統及不分區議員,應在服務3年後舉辦公民投票,如果他們拒絕,新大會應在1個月內舉辦,候選人被選來為了替補空位。正副總統候選人應經多數決得到任命。

e. Arrange for the election on the first Tuesday in June,in appropriate years, of new candidates for

President and Vice-Presidents, and members-at-large ofthe House of Representatives, all being

presented to the nation's voters as a ticket; if noticket achieve a majority, the Overseer shall arrange

another election, on the third Tuesday in June, betweenthe two persons having the most votes; and if

referendum so determine he shall provide similararrangements for the nomination and election of

candidates.

In this election, the one having the most votes shallprevail.

e.為新政府總統,及不分區眾議員候選人,在適當年份安排選舉,在6月的第1個星期2,所有代表國家選民的是選票,如果選票沒達到多數,監察員應為兩位最高票者,安排另一個選舉在6月第3個星期2,當決定好後,他應為選舉及提名,提供相似的安排。

在此選舉,最高票者贏得勝利。

SECTION 9. The Overseer shall also:

第九節。監察員也應該:

a. Arrange for the convening of the national legislativehouses on the fourth Tuesday of July.

a.安排召開國家立法院,在7月第4個星期2。

b. Arrange for inauguration of the President andVice-Presidents on the second Tuesday of August.

b.安排正副總統就職典禮,在8月第2個星期2。

SECTION 10. All costs of electoral procedures shall bepaid from public funds, and there shall be no

private contributions to parties or candidates; nocontributions or expenditures for meetings,

conventions, or campaigns shall be made; and no candidatefor office may make any personal

expenditures unless authorized by a uniform rule of theOverseer; and persons or group- making

expenditures, directly or indirectly, in support ofprospective candidates shall report to the Overseer

and shall conform to his regulations.

第十節。所有選舉程序花費應由公共資金支付,不可有任何私人捐款給政黨或候選人,沒有會議、大會、競選的捐款或經費可被編列,沒有官員的候選人可做任何個人支出,除非得到監察員的統一規定的授權;個人或團體為支助有希望的候選人,所做直接或間接的支出,應向監察員報告並符合其規定。

SECTION 11. Expenses of the Electoral Branch shall be metby the addition of one percent to the net

annual taxable income returns of taxpayers, this sum tobe held by the Chancellor of Financial Affairs

for disposition by the Overseer.

第十一節。選舉部門的花費應與年度稅收總收入的1%吻合,這款相由財政長官保管,由監察員配制。

Funds shall be distributed to parties in proportion tothe respective number of votes cast for the

President and Governors at the last election, except thatnew parties, on being recognized, shall share

in proportion to their number. Party adminstrators shallmake allocations to legislative candidates in

amounts proportional to the party vote at the lastelection.

除了獲承認的新政黨,資金應按上次總統及州長大選的得票數做比例分配,政黨管理員應按照與上次政黨得票數成比例的資金,分配給候選人。

Expenditures shall be audited by the Watchkeeper; andsums not expended within four years shall be

returned to the Treasury.

It shall be a condition of every communications franchisethat reasonable facilities shall be available

for allocations by the Overseer.

支出應由守望者審計,如果4年內不花掉應退還給財政部。應由監察員劃分場地。

TOP

返回列表